Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] marshalling, unmarshalling

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: [OpenSAML] marshalling, unmarshalling


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jay Packard <>
  • To:
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] marshalling, unmarshalling
  • Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:19:17 -0700



Chad La Joie wrote:


Jay Packard wrote:
According to http://svn.middleware.georgetown.edu/view/java-xmltooling/branches/1.0sig/src/org/opensaml/xml/io/Marshaller.java?revision=118&view=markup&pathrev=126, the marshall and unmarshall methods are not static. Don't I have to use a marshalling/unmarshalling factory?

Again, here is the documentation on unmarshalling
https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/OpenSAML/OSTwoUserManual

And here is the documentation on marshalling:
https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/OpenSAML/OSTwoUsrManJavaWriteToXML
Is the source I found out of date? The examples from your links don't disagree. They also use a marshalling/unmarshalling factory rather than a static function.

Also, the marshaller returns an org.w3c.dom.Element object. Can I simply cast this to an java.io.Serializable class (which is returned by the method in my port type stub)?

This is an incredibly basic Java question and not appropriate for this list. If you need to know if Element is serializable go look at the Javadoc for it.

What makes you think I hadn't looked at the Javadocs? I did and saw that Element is an interface so it is not serializable. So my question was more rhetorical. However, I looked at the ResponseType stub class returned by my XACMLAuthorizationPortType stub class, and saw that it does implement java.io.Serializable, so this answers my question.
Without asking it directly, I was really just trying to understand from your experience the way the Element object is typically returned in a web service, not for you to explain something basic like the way casting works.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page