mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: "'Patrick Krug'" <>, <>
Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 13:07:51 -0400
Organization: The Ohio State University

> I am using the SourceID.Net toolkit implementation. What the
SourceID.Net
> implemenation did not implement was the signing of the Assertion.

Oops. I wouldn't have suggested it if I had known, sorry. That's kind of 95%
of the point of using a toolkit, signing's the hard part.

-- Scott

RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Patrick Krug, 05/02/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Tom Scavo, 05/02/2008
  - RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Patrick Krug, 05/02/2008
- RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Scott Cantor, 05/02/2008
  - RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Patrick Krug, 05/02/2008
    - RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Scott Cantor, 05/02/2008
      - RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Patrick Krug, 05/02/2008
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Patrick Krug, 05/09/2008
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model, Scott Cantor, 05/09/2008

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] Saml error - Element 'Signature' is not valid for content model