OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

The library doesn't claim that it supports/models all the various schema 
types.  If it did, this would obviously be a problem.  I'll probably 
implement the other schema types at some point, but at the time I didn't 
need them so I didn't implement them.

Kenny Pearce wrote:
> Isn't this kind of an undesireable limitation of the library, in terms
> of full specification support? If I create object providers, should I
> submit a patch?
>
> On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 09:46 -0400, Scott Cantor wrote:
> > > You have to create object providers for any schema type that you wish to
> > > use that is not included in library that you are using.
> > Or just don't use a schema type.
> >
> > -- Scott

--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
 http://www.switch.ch