OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

Oh, no, I forgot.  File a bug.

Håkon Sagehaug wrote:
> 2008/3/5, Chad La Joie 
> <>:
> > Yeah, it's a bug.  I think I'm just going to rip out that code on the
> > marshallers and unmarshallers that makes the check.  It's turning out to
> > be a pain and I know the C++ code doesn't have it.
>
>
> Hi
>
> Have you "riped out that code", I still get the same errors after I did a
> svn update.
>
> cheers, Håkon
>
>
>
> Scott Cantor wrote:
> > > > I'm receive the xml message from a different system and just want to
> > > > unmarshall it
> > > Well, that system is sending something it really shouldn't send.
> > >
> > > >      Seems like that might be a bug in the code, though.
> > > > My or others?
> > > It's arguably as bug in OpenSAML. It looks up the unmarshaller by type
> > > first, and that particular code is insisting that the element not be
> > Issuer.
> > > Since it claims to be a type-based unmarshaller, I'm not sure it should
> > do
> > > that.
> > >
> > > (This is Java, so I'm not fixing it or claiming it is or isn't broken,
> > just
> > > musing about it.)
> > >
> > > -- Scott
> >
> > --
> > SWITCH
> > Serving Swiss Universities
> > --------------------------
> > Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
> > Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
> > phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
> > ,
> >  http://www.switch.ch

--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
 http://www.switch.ch