mace-opensaml-users - Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Håkon Sagehaug" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:31:20 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Kv/RRMP7syZBUPdfF98pnFXejFg2mSbtxdMGhmSxS0f+LhYT56SlIrak2fhjOpDbBDJZKH8V3BpiP73VbpXfitwuoTAyhgQ1RnNsOxQGtR4Mi/9xbjYoz725Aq29TGOaNmAu7vmQcoPjVaQdCek8qoW0wTy3eLPgN/pkeS6ZpK8=
2008/3/5, Chad La Joie <>:
Hi
Have you "riped out that code", I still get the same errors after I did a svn update.
cheers, Håkon
Yeah, it's a bug. I think I'm just going to rip out that code on the
marshallers and unmarshallers that makes the check. It's turning out to
be a pain and I know the C++ code doesn't have it.
Hi
Have you "riped out that code", I still get the same errors after I did a svn update.
cheers, Håkon
Scott Cantor wrote:
>> I'm receive the xml message from a different system and just want to
>> unmarshall it
>
> Well, that system is sending something it really shouldn't send.
>
>> Seems like that might be a bug in the code, though.
>> My or others?
>
> It's arguably as bug in OpenSAML. It looks up the unmarshaller by type
> first, and that particular code is insisting that the element not be Issuer.
> Since it claims to be a type-based unmarshaller, I'm not sure it should do
> that.
>
> (This is Java, so I'm not fixing it or claiming it is or isn't broken, just
> musing about it.)
>
> -- Scott
>
>
--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
, http://www.switch.ch
--
Håkon Sagehaug
Research Assistant
Parallab, Bergen Center for Computational Science (BCCS)
UNIFOB AS (University of Bergen Research Company)
- Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Håkon Sagehaug, 03/05/2008
- RE: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2008
- Message not available
- Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Håkon Sagehaug, 03/05/2008
- RE: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2008
- Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Chad La Joie, 03/05/2008
- RE: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2008
- Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Håkon Sagehaug, 03/18/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML] Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Chad La Joie, 03/18/2008
- Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Chad La Joie, 03/05/2008
- RE: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2008
- Re: Unmashalling a SAML2.0 Response, Håkon Sagehaug, 03/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.