Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: artifact resolution over SOAP back channel

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: artifact resolution over SOAP back channel


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Denis Koelewijn" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: artifact resolution over SOAP back channel
  • Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:54:29 +0200
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fMcd8DJkL9Oc/noiTH2Qqg1I+aBL+hdR/8VYHOQ8YJasbgFK8kRMwT/xNdQphS2IOWUORncYrNJ+dnZfLcoOMOQLcBYP00448w+Ulv29Tq5vtlVkp4wXacYWJdjKtupMBo/4iX/BUXlx1UnNjN8w++xEPUWT+N+YurAFZKKd8Gk=

Chad,

OK, thanks for that information.

We will be waiting for that code ;-)

Regards, Denis

On 06/08/07, Chad La Joie <> wrote:
Okay, what you need then is not the encoder/decoders but the SOAP
client, which isn't yet done but will be this weekend (as I have to add
artifact support code to Shib this week).

Denis Koelewijn wrote:
> Chad,
>
> Thanks for you quick reply. Let me clarify my question.
>
> In my case the SAML Requestor receives an artifact from the SAML Responder
> via the user agent (redirect). To have the artifact resolved, I need to send
> an ArtifactResolve message to the SAML Responder. I'd like to do this over
> SOAP, so I need to create a SOAP ArtifactResolve message. This message is a
> request in a new request-response (to the SAML Responder), not a response to
> an existing request.
>
> The HTTPSoap11Encoder, though, needs an HTTPResponse object to which the
> artifact is written. And that's where I'm stuck. Am I using the wrong class
> to do the encoding ?
>
> I'm using OpenSAML2 by the way.


--
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page