OpenSAML user discussion

["Scott Cantor" <>]

> > Assertions, in the code, are set up to properly handle new statement
> > types already, as well.
> 
> They are, but a validating parser will reject substitution.

I should add that the C++ will also reject the substitution version because
it will refuse to process a child element that isn't of the allowable
element names. I would suggest the Java do this as well, at least at some
future point once there's time to fix it, since accepting invalid SAML just
creates interoperability issues.

-- Scott