OpenSAML user discussion

["Douglas Squirrel" <>]

OK, that ran fine!

So now I have a working version with three new libraries (xmlsec, Xalan,
and Xerces) plus a few small changes to files. Is this useful to you at
all? It's fine if not - we can just maintain ourselves.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor 
[mailto:]
 
Sent: 01 August 2007 02:20
To: 

Subject: RE: Xerces 2.8.1 and Xalan 2.7.0 with OpenSAML 1.1

> and ran the tests again, whereupon the call to verify() in
> SignatureTest.java failed (it hadn't before I added the check).
> 
> Did I add the right check? Is this what we expect?

The second test had a small change in it that was probably there to
catch
this exact issue in case they ever made the library behave worse (which
they
did). Just change a to a2 on the last line and it will verify the
reparsed
object, like I would have assumed it was already doing.

The unit tests were never real tests in the sense you mean it (as
presumably
a Java person who actually uses tests). It's all stuff I played with and
changed constantly to check for edge cases in the sandbox when libraries
changed or test performance.

-- Scott



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________