mace-opensaml-users - RE: java-xmltooling build issue
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Paul Hethmon" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: java-xmltooling build issue
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:50:24 -0800
No problem, I realize it's still a work in progress. Just wanted to make
sure I provide useful information to you.
Thanks,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:39 PM
To:
Subject: RE: java-xmltooling build issue
> Ok, I wasn't sure whether to post this or not,
If you're concerned about my earlier post, my point is not to discourage
bug reports, but to emphasize realistic expectations. It should be
abundantly clear by now that this new code DOES NOT WORK YET. It's
closer than it appears (the C++ is actually pretty close to stable I
think, some more doc work is left to do), but it's not there yet.
So asking us to debug problems *using it* is not going to get a quick
response if it isn't immediately obvious what the issue is.
If you find a bug, the best thing to do is post it to
bugzilla.internet2.edu
If you find a possible bug, that's still the best thing, we'll just
close it if it's not a bug.
But don't expect to post stack traces of your own code and get a one day
response of "here's all you did wrong..." because we're not in that mode
yet, and chances are you did nothing wrong, there's just a bug or the
code isn't stable in that spot yet. But we have to have the actual bug
in our source to fix it (i.e. what you posted) , or us tracking it down
will probably take longer than people are expecting to wait for an
answer.
Thanks,
-- Scott
- java-xmltooling build issue, Paul Hethmon, 12/19/2006
- Re: java-xmltooling build issue, Chad La Joie, 12/19/2006
- RE: java-xmltooling build issue, Scott Cantor, 12/19/2006
- RE: java-xmltooling build issue, Paul Hethmon, 12/19/2006
- Re: java-xmltooling build issue, Chad La Joie, 12/24/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.