mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Tom Scavo" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:17:51 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BEopPhDanqk/gINfnDsZYyO84qoF7hOGPzmotP+082tBKsNFngFV26GCVlg6fdG6mpfuA7nc9jpQm/K+EKFuBy600NmeXSpDD/7TqO2yA/vX+jN3Cf3qe/Bt0ZPGN/7mnZ5QGModeA9vLe5QvwPvmXs/gl7ZBDVTE4qNNooa+6A=
Yes, it appears OpenSAML 1.1 will work with JDK 1.3 (although I
haven't used it with that Java platform):
https://mail.internet2.edu/wws/arc/mace-opensaml-users/2005-07/msg00031.html
This Google search will turn up more information:
site:internet2.edu opensaml jdk 1.3
Hope this helps,
Tom
On 12/13/06, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> I thought OpenSAML 1.1 worked with JDK 1.3 or higher?
To be honest I lost track. I think JAXP 1.3 requires 1.4, but I don't know
anymore. Somebody who knows should probably put up a topic for it.
> > Could you give me a quick idea of how much work would be needed to use
> > OpenSAML with Java 1.3, if it is feasible.
Pretty much "I have no clue" is the only answer I can give. Since that code
is frozen and the new code will NOT support 1.3, I think it would be a very
bad idea for anybody to use it that way.
How dead does a JDK have to be before it's considered bad to rely on it?
> > My needs are pretty much only generating digitally signed SAML v1.1
> > messages.
Chances are good that will hit exactly the functionality that won't work. At
a minimum, you need DOM3 to make the XML ID attributes work or signing won't
work. Whether that's feasible with Java 1.3 I don't know.
-- Scott
- OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, victor . bourachot, 12/13/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/13/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/13/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/13/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Gluck, Janice, 12/14/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/14/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.