mace-opensaml-users - RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:05:32 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> I thought OpenSAML 1.1 worked with JDK 1.3 or higher?
To be honest I lost track. I think JAXP 1.3 requires 1.4, but I don't know
anymore. Somebody who knows should probably put up a topic for it.
> > Could you give me a quick idea of how much work would be needed to use
> > OpenSAML with Java 1.3, if it is feasible.
Pretty much "I have no clue" is the only answer I can give. Since that code
is frozen and the new code will NOT support 1.3, I think it would be a very
bad idea for anybody to use it that way.
How dead does a JDK have to be before it's considered bad to rely on it?
> > My needs are pretty much only generating digitally signed SAML v1.1
> > messages.
Chances are good that will hit exactly the functionality that won't work. At
a minimum, you need DOM3 to make the XML ID attributes work or signing won't
work. Whether that's feasible with Java 1.3 I don't know.
-- Scott
- OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, victor . bourachot, 12/13/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/13/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/13/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/13/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Gluck, Janice, 12/14/2006
- RE: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Scott Cantor, 12/14/2006
- Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3, Tom Scavo, 12/13/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.