Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: OpenSAML and JRE 1.3
  • Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:58:06 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hHUvcEtTW5eYupIMTDoyj67SbzgygF4FjE8pn7wK8s3RiAtR3TfLQz6g2zRDyhldOq4sUoq/MoyYrS7DT5JVVCTj1pIhSa3/i7dO71kZu85/UF+yM/VK/oWdKVmYNTKRzx/GM0lhA7VjXDISA7/Kp2yzT5IznV+1iPeHsp3lRLU=

I thought OpenSAML 1.1 worked with JDK 1.3 or higher?

Tom

On 12/13/06,

<>
wrote:
Hi,

I am studying the feasibility of building a SSO between our portal and a
proprietary application that is SAML compliant.
I came across your library, but unfortunately most of the servers we use
still run a JRE 1.3.

Could you give me a quick idea of how much work would be needed to use
OpenSAML with Java 1.3, if it is feasible.
My needs are pretty much only generating digitally signed SAML v1.1
messages.

Thank you,
--
Victor


This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page