mace-opensaml-users - RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:17:23 -0500
> Thanks for your elaborate answer, could you tell me what version of
> xmltooling I should be using?
There is no version yet, none of the code is released. I'm just saying I
can't debug your build problem because it's not in the code, it's in your
build environment. If you have the latest code, it should build.
> The plan is to get OpenSAML2 to work under .NET. I don't really know if
> this is possible, maybe you can give me some hints?
It's unmanaged C++ code. I don't know what the implications of that are for
mixing with managed code, but I imagine it's treated as some kind of legacy
library and might be a hassle to work with. Other than that, I have no idea,
as I don't use .NET
-- Scott
- OpenSAML 2.0 C++, barto, 11/20/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/20/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/27/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/27/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/29/2006
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/29/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/27/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/20/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.