mace-opensaml-users - RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Bart van den Oetelaar" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:11:04 +0100
Thanks for your elaborate answer, could you tell me what version of
xmltooling I should be using?
The plan is to get OpenSAML2 to work under .NET. I don't really know if
this is possible, maybe you can give me some hints?
Greets,
-Bart
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Verzonden: maandag 20 november 2006 19:13
Aan:
Onderwerp: RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++
> Though still in development, we are interested in its
> capabilities and like to be able to use it for testing.
> Basically Ive tried to get the C++ version of OpenSAML2 to
> work using the Trunk checkout of SVN. Im using Visual Studio
> 2005 Pro but am getting a lot of errors about not being able
> to instantiate a abstract class
> opensaml2\saml\saml2\metadata\metadata.h(161) : error C2259:
> 'xmltooling::AttributeExtensibleXMLObject' : cannot
> instantiate abstract class.
The code currently builds out of trunk. That's not true all of the time
since it's still under development, but it's usually true. Occasionally
there are Unix issues if I haven't done a build there in a while, but
mostly
with makefiles. Windows definitely builds.
I can't really do much to help resolve errors that are local. I've tried
to
minimally document the build process for the time being, but there will
be
more later once I firm up the library versions.
That particular error doesn't make much sense. I would assume you've got
the
wrong xmltooling code, maybe, but I can't tell.
> Now I know this is of course still an alpha/beta version, but
> is it workable yet?
Workable, yes. Supported, no, and the APIs may still change. And there
still
is no actual release of XML-Security that works fully with this code.
1.3.1
is due out shortly.
> So far, this is the only implementation
> of SAML2 Ive seen out there, unless anybody knows of any
> other, Id like to know to.
There are few, if any, that are designed as libraries for others to
build
on. There are projects that have code in them in the service of whatever
they're delivering themselves, like zxid.org, which is in C. There's
also
lasso, from entrouvert, also in C.
I'm not aware of any other C++, anywhere.
> If possible Id like to be able to use the OpenSAML2 library
> in our research/proof of concept project. Could you shed some
> light on the possibilities of the library in the near future?
I expect to be nearly feature complete by end of year, and probably API
stable shortly after.
There is at least one other group using the code, but two projects
doesn't
incent me very strongly to spend the time on an official beta. If I get
more
interest, I'll consider it, but I have to wait for the Apache code to
finalize.
-- Scott
Info Support - http://www.infosupport.com
Alle informatie in dit e-mailbericht is onder voorbehoud. Info Support is op
geen enkele wijze aansprakelijk voor vergissingen of onjuistheden in dit
bericht en staat niet in voor de juiste en volledige overbrenging van de
inhoud hiervan. Op al de werkzaamheden door Info Support uitgevoerd en op al
de aan ons gegeven opdrachten zijn onze Algemene Voorwaarden van toepassing,
gedeponeerd bij de griffie van de rechtbank te Utrecht op 12 januari 2005
onder nummer 261/2004 en bij de Kamer van Koophandel te Utrecht onder nr.
30135370. Een exemplaar zenden wij u op uw verzoek per omgaande kosteloos toe.
De informatie in dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de
geadresseerde. Gebruik van deze informatie door anderen is verboden.
Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze
informatie aan derden is niet toegestaan.
Dit e-mailbericht kan vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Indien u dit
bericht dus per ongeluk ontvangt, stelt Info Support het op prijs als u de
zender door een antwoord op deze e-mail hiervan op de hoogte brengt en deze
e-mail vervolgens vernietigt.
- OpenSAML 2.0 C++, barto, 11/20/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/20/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/27/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/27/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/29/2006
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/29/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/27/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/22/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Bart van den Oetelaar, 11/21/2006
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0 C++, Scott Cantor, 11/20/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.