mace-opensaml-users - Re: SAML 2.0

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

From: "Tom Scavo" <>
To: "Manuel Ernstberger" <>
Cc:
Subject: Re: SAML 2.0
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:34:44 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AHaq9k4k9U7YiPABl780ylJZpqkCtHCPC3wyWqCAJiKrqeSL1ntVky3+XMY2n99iFatBivV24lpp3v+LTXQHjmlJdAxsmiBiRYBmocc5yihnLnwMrgXSG/F9K6EpQuNsyL4cKy899BpAyJYnNdOXEUBDDYl/pZZVdBbYfMaYOCI=

On 9/12/06, Manuel Ernstberger
<>
wrote:

does anyone know, when OpenSAML will implement the SAML 2.0 specifications?

Work in this direction has already begun:

https://authdev.it.ohio-state.edu/twiki/bin/view/Shibboleth/OpenSAML

Hope this helps,
Tom

SAML 2.0, Manuel Ernstberger, 09/12/2006
- Re: SAML 2.0, Tom Scavo, 09/12/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Saml 2.0, Giuseppe Sarno, 09/26/2006
  - RE: Saml 2.0, Scott Cantor, 09/26/2006
    - Re: Saml 2.0, Tom Scavo, 09/27/2006
      - RE: Saml 2.0, Scott Cantor, 09/27/2006
      - Re: Saml 2.0, Chad La Joie, 09/27/2006