mace-opensaml-users - RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Pantvaidya, Vishwajit" <>
- To: Tom Scavo <>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:49:39 -0700
Thanks - It seems Netegrity also had a JSAML toolkit - but I am unable to
locate that (maybe after their takeover by CA?)
- Vish.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Scavo
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:48 PM
> To: Pantvaidya, Vishwajit
> Cc:
>
> Subject: Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?
>
> On 4/21/06, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit
> <>
> wrote:
> >
> > Meanwhile I see that there is another open source toolkit from sourceid.
> > Seems to be just SAML1.1 (i.e. probably does not have the value added
> > scenarios as Shibboleth). Was also thinking of taking a look at it.
> However,
> > they seem to have their own "open source" license - so I will need to
> verify
> > that it is acceptable.
>
> Here is a pointer to Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About SAML
> Toolkits and Implementations:
>
> https://mail.internet2.edu/wws/arc/shibboleth-dev/2005-04/msg00090.html
>
> Hope this helps,
> Tom
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, (continued)
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/20/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/20/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/20/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Scott Cantor, 04/20/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/20/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/21/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/21/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/21/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/21/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/21/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/21/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/21/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.