mace-opensaml-users - SAML1.x or SAML2.x?
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Pantvaidya, Vishwajit" <>
- To:
- Subject: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:17:32 -0700
Hello, Just started looking at SAML – so please pardon the very
basic questions. But I need to achieve SSO using SAML for the following flow: -
user comes to our website but is redirected
to a login page at a remote authenticating webserver -
user enters logon userid/pwd -
remote webserver authenticates and
assembles a SAML assertion -
servlet appends SAML assertion and redirects
the request through browser to our website -
we process the request and allow
user access to our resources if SAML assertion shows successful authentication So basically looks like in our case the SAML assertion xml
will be passed through the URL parameters. I checked SAML 1.1 and 2.0 specs and it seems that 1.1 does
not support this scenario. So - do I need to use SAML2.0 (it seems the SAML2 HTTPRedirect
binding will fit this usecase)? - in that case, should I download the OpenSAML 2.0 source
from https://projects.middleware.georgetown.edu/viewcvs/java-opensaml2/trunk/,
build it and use it that way Any other suggestions welcome. Thanks, Vish. |
- SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/20/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/20/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/20/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/20/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Scott Cantor, 04/20/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/20/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/21/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/21/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/21/2006
- RE: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Pantvaidya, Vishwajit, 04/21/2006
- Re: SAML1.x or SAML2.x?, Tom Scavo, 04/21/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.