Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Chad La Joie <>
  • To: OpenSAML <>
  • Subject: Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:27:41 -0500
  • Organization: UIS - Project Sentinel

I don't think so. The serialized form is the canonical form and thus the one that should be used for comparison.

Tom Scavo wrote:
On 1/12/06, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:

Because the equals() being used is Object.equals() which simply checks
for reference equality, i.e. nameid1 == nameid2.


Right, that's why I asked if SAMLObject should override equals. Shouldn't SAMLObjects be comparable without resorting to
serialization?

Tom

--
Chad La Joie 315Q St. Mary's Hall
OIS-Middleware 202.687.0124



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page