Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Chad La Joie <>
  • Cc: OpenSAML <>
  • Subject: Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:24:15 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LAWpzaZV3CsPfvBbc/TW/shU1p3I3vaP4OygQfC2KNBiA5wXr76ybfWeKpqtYhM0DZoszeOdPPpy1+iv3spOco8vFYjdDVkIE0B7S7EMjRW2IYRHw+1LwIxf21NfnViFs2gGPHNJCvNSl8neUTmjfC2tUhsBs26aJUS4XFMb3YM=
On 1/12/06, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> Because the equals() being used is Object.equals() which simply checks
> for reference equality, i.e. nameid1 == nameid2.

Right, that's why I asked if SAMLObject should override equals.
Shouldn't SAMLObjects be comparable without resorting to
serialization?

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page