Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Chad La Joie <>
  • Cc: OpenSAML <>
  • Subject: Re: SAMLNameIdentifier.equals
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:51:53 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qEZjdPOHLh17GAceFpZcaAgs94y3VicQxEcmQk8r4F/YJ92D6BY1ZJt06Ij4W9rE6r6SvQgCwX6D/FRLYvl5GSsWuHVjLsb1orIMBxoR63jBpMEn3SL1WaVBNvBtotSgiXO6iwnqEbZsPhk7oKY5lMSxrlutLtFfDuSXndhMpTM=
On 1/13/06, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> The normal way, in Java, to do equality checking when there are
> application specific ways to do it...

I didn't mean to give the impression that the problems I'm having are
application specific. This thread is about SAML NameIdentifiers as
defined in SAML 1.1 core. Even the format handlers conform to core,
there's nothing application specific about them.

For example, the emailAddress format must satisfy RFC 2822, which the
handler enforces. Similarly, the X509SubjectName format satisfies RFC
2253. The handlers simply enforce the requirements of the spec.

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page