mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML 2.0
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Matthew Fowle <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: OpenSAML 2.0
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:55:14 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Pf97olqVWT4tTEss8Kr2bCq4WMDzrnHFUyozvShMDCJctXp1jY2DFz9oP33yYAwMMFOTwj+kerFcoUQJ3V0xBQ17yjW30YjJamY417yep/CijqOh4FvV9NrMltUtNIZZKEF+DYJMWms6zqEPn2OjExmqlcrKc07O2WUnGWKI77g=
Quick glance, but OpenSAML 2.0 is java only it looks?
I'd be interested in a C# port, but thats probably only me. Maybe I'll have some luck with IKVM. Any projections on what external libraries OpenSAML will rely on?
I've doing some very basic saml2.0 stuff for C#, but its basically just single use hackery. It'd be nice to have something more generally compliant.
-Rektide
- OpenSAML 2.0, Lars Beekmann, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Tom Scavo, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Matthew Fowle, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Matthew Fowle, 11/21/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0, Lars Beekmann, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/23/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0, Lars Beekmann, 11/21/2005
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0, Scott Cantor, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Tom Scavo, 11/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.