mace-opensaml-users - RE: OpenSAML 2.0
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: "'Lars Beekmann'" <>, "'Chad La Joie'" <>, <>
- Subject: RE: OpenSAML 2.0
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:29:46 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Hmm. I'd like to build a prototype based on SAML 2.0 with at least
> browser-artifact. Will this "basic-function" be available with the java
> code you mentioned? Is there going to be something one can work with by
> this year?
I would assume not for your purposes, if I were you. If you're prototyping,
I would steer clear of artifact (it's much harder than the alternatives) and
I would just brute force the XML.
-- Scott
- OpenSAML 2.0, Lars Beekmann, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Tom Scavo, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Matthew Fowle, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Matthew Fowle, 11/21/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0, Lars Beekmann, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/23/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0, Lars Beekmann, 11/21/2005
- RE: OpenSAML 2.0, Scott Cantor, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 11/21/2005
- Re: OpenSAML 2.0, Tom Scavo, 11/21/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.