grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Peter DiCamillo <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:48:17 -0500
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
For gidNumber, we've been using the idIndex that Grouper generates for group (and other objects): https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Integer+IDs+on+Grouper+objects For us, Grouper is the authoritative source for the GIDs.
Peter
On 1/20/17 3:38 PM, Michael R Gettes wrote:
Has anyone done work to manage posix gidNumber within grouper and would you
care to share your work?
I believe it should be possible to create a global attribute keeping the next
gidNumber and then to assign a gidNumber attribute with the current global
gidNumber to a group and then increment the global.
This should be documented some place so others can leverage.
I also don’t understand how to specify which groups should pushed to LDAP
(and how to exclude subsets). If anyone has done this and has examples -
please share.
I am concerned the current PSPng implementation presumes 2 group objects in
LDAP, one for the normal group and a separate group for the Posix version.
This doesn’t seem right to me, we should be able to include posix attributes
within any group object. I have private email out to Bert these questions as
well.
If I can get these problems resolved then I am halfway to eliminating the
need for the CMU GAP code.
/mrg
- [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Michael R Gettes, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Peter DiCamillo, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Michael R Gettes, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Keith Hazelton, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Michael R Gettes, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Keith Hazelton, 01/20/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Keith Hazelton, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Michael R Gettes, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Keith Hazelton, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Michael R Gettes, 01/20/2017
- Re: [grouper-users] grouper posix gidNumber, Peter DiCamillo, 01/20/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.