Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

[Shilen Patel <>]

That¹s great to hear!

Thanks!

- Shilen

On 4/9/15, 5:20 PM, "Robert Bradley" 
<>
 wrote:

>On 08/04/15 20:18, Shilen Patel wrote:
>> We discussed this on the dev call and didn¹t come up with any other
>> approaches.  So if you do try out the composite idea, please let us know
>> how it goes.
>>
>> Note that because adding the composite group flattens out the
>>memberships,
>> you¹d end up having ~830 more membership records.  But that¹s a lot less
>> than the 30+ million group sets you should be saving. :)
>
>Thanks for discussing the problem and for your help in solving it!  I
>had noticed the GroupSet entry on the agenda, but failed to get my SIP
>client installed and working before the call had finished. :(
>
>On the plus side, I finally managed to test the composite-group solution
>on our development system, and can confirm that it works as expected.  I
>used the complement-with-empty-group approach in this test, but I assume
>that unions (via the old Admin UI) or intersect-with-self work just as
>well.
>
>Robert
>
>-- 
>Dr Robert Bradley
>Identity and Access Management, IT Services, University of Oxford
>