grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Scott Koranda <>
- To: Jim Fox <>
- Cc: Steven Carmody <>, Grouper-Users <>
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 19:33:29 -0500
Thanks Jim.
I assume the group in Google is used for, among other things, email
communication between students and the course instructor(s). Is that
correct?
Is there any concern that when the Google group is deleted the archive
of those email threads for the course is lost? Or is that just an
accepted constraint?
Thanks again,
Scott
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Jim Fox
<>
wrote:
>
>
> We keep a year's worth of course groups. Once a course group
> is older than that it is deleted from our group service and
> consequently deleted from google. And deleted from our AD.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Scott Koranda wrote:
>
>> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:38:58
>> From: Scott Koranda
>> <>
>> To: Steven Carmody
>> <>
>> Cc: Grouper-Users
>> <>
>> Subject: Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know August is a crummy time to ask leading questions since many
>> people are out on vacation/holiday, but if anybody is provisioning
>> from Grouper to Google and has thought about what to do for "delete" I
>> would be grateful if you could drop me a note.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>> We are interested to know how other campuses deal with "delete" for
>>> groups, and
>>> in particular course groups. In the current deployment when the course
>>> group
>>> is removed from the SOR (LDAP in this case), the loader of course removes
>>> it
>>> from Grouper. The custom provisioning code at this point does not call
>>> the Directory
>>> API 'delete' call for the group but instead uses the Groups Setting
>>> API 'patch' call
>>> to change the resource setting for 'archiveOnly' to 'true'. The
>>> primary reason for doing
>>> this is to not "lose" associated "buckets" of information that might
>>> have accumulated
>>> when the group was in use.
>>>
>>> What approaches to "delete" for course groups are other campuses taking?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Scott K
>>
>>
>
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., (continued)
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., David Langenberg, 08/07/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Steven Carmody, 08/08/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., David Langenberg, 08/08/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Steven Carmody, 08/08/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Jim Fox, 08/07/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Steven Carmody, 08/07/2014
- RE: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Jim Fox, 08/08/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Steven Carmody, 08/08/2014
- RE: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Jim Fox, 08/08/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Steven Carmody, 08/07/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Scott Koranda, 08/13/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Scott Koranda, 08/22/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Jim Fox, 08/22/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Scott Koranda, 08/25/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Jim Fox, 08/25/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Scott Koranda, 08/25/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Jim Fox, 08/22/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., Scott Koranda, 08/22/2014
- Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ...., David Langenberg, 08/07/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.