Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Steven Carmody <>
  • To: Jim Fox <>
  • Cc: Grouper-Users <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....
  • Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 11:19:20 -0400

Jim,

any chance you could share some screen snaps of that custom UI ?

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 8, 2014, at 12:17 AM, Jim Fox
> <>
> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, a custom UI.
>
> Jim
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Steven Carmody
> <>
> Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2014 4:16 PM
> To: Jim Fox
> Cc: Grouper-Users
> Subject: Re: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Jim Fox
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Our UI that lets people send their groups to Google
>
> Jim -- is that UI separate from the grouper UI ? Sounds like it ....
>
>
>> includes a setting for "who can send to the group". We always set a "no
>> one can view the membership" flag. I think that was to prevent leaking of
>> membership viewer controls.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Steven Carmody wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 12:11:51
>>> From: Steven Carmody
>>> <>
>>> To: Grouper-Users
>>> <>
>>> Subject: [grouper-users] replication to Google, Phase 2 ....
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Like a growing number of schools, we have implemented a mechanism to
>>> replicate group memberships from Grouper to GAE. The initial
>>> implementation was very basic, and will create a group in GAE, and then
>>> manage the membership on an ongoing basis.
>>>
>>> Initially, we were doing this with Course groups, and a small number of
>>> department-oriented groups. However, we're in the process of delegating
>>> to departments the ability and authority to create and mange groups to
>>> meet their local needs. We're discovering that people use groups for
>>> different purposes (duh ! ), and that in some cases they would like the
>>> properties of the target google group to be set differently from the
>>> defaults. This isn't really a surprise, and we expect to see the same
>>> sort of requests when we start replicating to AD in the next few weeks.
>>>
>>> We're interested in starting a conversation about how to address these
>>> requirements. We're wondering whether other campuses have started to
>>> develop ways to address these sorts of requirements.
>>>
>>> Looking forward to an interesting conversation !
>>>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page