grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Chris Hyzer <>
- To: Peter DiCamillo <>, Shilen Patel <>
- Cc: Gagné Sébastien <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:15:42 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
I wonder if you could do privileges by semester, or do all the people with
privileges need it for 5 years back?
Thanks,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter DiCamillo
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:02 PM
To: Shilen Patel
Cc: Chris Hyzer; Gagné Sébastien;
Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?
Thanks, I'll try changing includeFlattenedPrivileges, it's set to true
now. I tested by adding a person to the group that is used for
privileges. We have about 800,000 course groups, since we have to keep
the course memberships for at least five years.
Peter
On 1/31/13 1:08 PM, Shilen Patel wrote:
> The delay may be in creating change log entries for the flattened
> privileges. In the grouper-loader.properties file, what do you have
> changeLog.includeFlattenedPrivileges set to? If it's true and you don't
> care about flattened privileges, set that to false and see if it resolves
> the issue. However, in either case, I wouldn't think it would take an
> hour to do this. Is the member (that's being added to the group which has
> privileges to all the course groups) a person or a group? How many course
> groups are there?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Shilen
>
>
> On 1/31/13 9:40 AM, "Peter DiCamillo"
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/30/13 5:55 PM, Chris Hyzer wrote:
>>>> We've encountered performance problems when assigning the members of a
>>>> group
>>>> privileges to thousands of groups,
>>> I think that was on an old version of Grouper, this is not a problem
>>> anymore, right?
>> I do still see one problem. If we make a change to the membership of the
>> group that has privileges for all the course groups, entries in the
>> change log temp table are not processed for a very long time. For
>> Grouper 2.1, I stopped timing it after an hour. It took several hours
>> for 1.6. We use a change log consumer for near real-time provisioning,
>> so that's a problem. In some cases, users are making requests to access
>> a service, and expect to get access within about 10 minutes. The only
>> solution I have is to handle changes to that group as a maintenance
>> activity.
>>
>> Peter
>
- [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Peter DiCamillo, 01/30/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Gagné Sébastien, 01/30/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Chris Hyzer, 01/30/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Peter DiCamillo, 01/31/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Shilen Patel, 01/31/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Peter DiCamillo, 01/31/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Shilen Patel, 01/31/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Chris Hyzer, 01/31/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Peter DiCamillo, 01/31/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Shilen Patel, 01/31/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Peter DiCamillo, 01/31/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Chris Hyzer, 01/30/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] Defining rule-based group privileges?, Gagné Sébastien, 01/30/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.