grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Klug, Lawrence" <>
- To: "Klug, Lawrence" <>, Tom Zeller <>
- Cc: Grouper Users Mailing List <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:17:05 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
Tom,
I believe the issue is resolved. I had to modify the file where the
uclaMemeber objectClass attributes are defined: ldappcng.xml
bulkSync is working now. I've got to document this for the UCLA team.
Thanks,
Lawrence
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Klug, Lawrence
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 8:23 AM
To: Tom Zeller
Cc: Grouper Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
Tom,
Here is a snippet from running "bulkCalc" using the new configuration. The
uclaMember objectClass is being picked up, but the attribute isMemberOf
should now be uclaIsMemberOf . How can I fix this issue?
Thanks,
Lawrence
-ldappcng -logSpml -printRequests -sync
<ldappc:calcResponse status='success'
requestID='2011/11/14-08:15:00.357_Q49YMIXY'>
<ldappc:id
ID='urn:mace:ucla.edu:ppid:person:C4196E1230C9452191D7E416FC4BD9F3'/>
<ldappc:pso entityName='member'>
<psoID
ID='uclappid=urn:mace:ucla.edu:ppid:person:C4196E1230C9452191D7E416FC4BD9F3,ou=people,dc=edtest,dc=ucla,dc=edu'
targetID='ldap'/>
<data>
<dsml:attr xmlns:dsml='urn:oasis:names:tc:DSML:2:0:core'
name='objectClass'>
<dsml:value>uclaMember</dsml:value>
</dsml:attr>
<dsml:attr xmlns:dsml='urn:oasis:names:tc:DSML:2:0:core'
name='isMemberOf'>
<dsml:value>etc:sysadmingroup</dsml:value>
<dsml:value>test:testGroup</dsml:value>
</dsml:attr>
</data>
</ldappc:pso>
</ldappc:calcResponse>
</ldappc:bulkCalcResponse>
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Klug, Lawrence
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:48 AM
To: Tom Zeller
Cc: Grouper Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
I'm implementing the "uclaMember" objectClass. It's a bit confusing, so I
want to confirm with you.
In ldappc-resolver I made these changes:
Change this:
<resolver:DataConnector id="StaticDataConnector" xsi:type="dc:Static">
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass-eduMember">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>eduMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="stem-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>organizationalUnit</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="member-objectclass">
<dc:Value>eduMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
</resolver:DataConnector>
To This:
<resolver:DataConnector id="StaticDataConnector" xsi:type="dc:Static">
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass-uclaMember">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>uclaMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="stem-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>organizationalUnit</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="member-objectclass">
<dc:Value>uclaMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
</resolver:DataConnector>
Change this:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="group-objectclass-eduMember"
xsi:type="ad:Simple">
<resolver:Dependency ref="StaticDataConnector" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
To This:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="group-objectclass-uclaMember"
xsi:type="ad:Simple">
<resolver:Dependency ref="StaticDataConnector" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
Change this:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="hasMember" xsi:type="grouper:Member"
sourceAttributeID="members">
<resolver:Dependency ref="GroupDataConnector" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="ldap" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="g:gsa" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
To This:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="uclaHasMember" xsi:type="grouper:Member"
sourceAttributeID="members">
<resolver:Dependency ref="GroupDataConnector" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="ldap" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="g:gsa" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
Question: Should this block be changed (isMemberOf => uclaIsMemberOf )?
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="groupIsMemberOf" xsi:type="grouper:Group"
sourceAttributeID="groups">
<resolver:Dependency ref="GroupDataConnector" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
Thanks,
Lawrence
- [grouper-users] Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, (continued)
- [grouper-users] Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/08/2011
- [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/09/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Pål Axelsson, 11/09/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Ma, Ying, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/16/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/17/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/17/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Ma, Ying, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Pål Axelsson, 11/09/2011
- [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/09/2011
- [grouper-users] Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/08/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.