grouper-users - [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Klug, Lawrence" <>
- To: Tom Zeller <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:23:30 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
Tom,
I've been talking with our LDAP administrator and apparently we have a
naming conflict with the eduMember objectClass. This is a result of the
upgrade to Sun Java System Directory Server Enterprise Edition 6.3.1.
Please read her comments below:
Yes, eduMember is the cause of the problem. I have eduMember implemented in
the directory. However, one of the eduMember attribute isMemberOf has the
name conflict with DSEE 6.3 system attribute name. I had to delete the
eduMember version of isMemberOf during our migration from DSEE 5.2 to 6.3. In
other words, eduMember implementation use to be fine in DSEE5.2, but it can
no longer be implemented in DSEE 6.3 because of the name conflict.
I'm now implementing a new object class uclaMember in eds7. This object class
has two attributes: uclaIsMemberOf and uclaHasMember. I'm going to ask you to
try use uclaMember instead of eduMember with LDAPCNG to see if this could be
a possible workaround.
If you want, you can post the issue to grouper mailing list to see if anyone
else has encounter the same issue and if they have a better workaround.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Tom Zeller
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 5:12 PM
To: Klug, Lawrence
Cc:
Subject: Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
You probably need to add the eduMember objectclass to your ldap server. The
schema file is not included in the distribution, which is a bug, which will
be fixed in 2.1.
The objectClass for a group is defined in ldappcng.xml :
<object id="group" authoritative="true">
<attribute name="objectClass" ref="group-objectclass-eduMember" />
and ldappc-resolver.xml :
<resolver:DataConnector id="StaticDataConnector" xsi:type="dc:Static">
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass-eduMember">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>eduMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
The ${groupObjectClass} is defined in ldappc.properties, which is by default :
groupObjectClass=groupOfNames
The eduMember objectclass, however, will probably need to be added to your
ldap directory.
The eduMember schema definition is not included in the distribution, but is
available from
http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/i2mi/trunk/ldappcng/ldappcng/misc/ldap/
Apologies for the hassle.
TomZ
https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/GRP-505
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Klug, Lawrence
<>
wrote:
> When running LDAPPCNG 2.x for group synchronization, we are observing
> LDAP errors and some of the changes are not propagated to the
> directory. We're seeing two types of errors:
>
> LDAP: error code 67 - Not Allowed On RDN
>
> LDAP: error code 19 - Constraint violation in modifications
>
>
>
> The errors seem to revolve around add/delete operations, i.e. adding
> or deleting a member from an existing group.
>
>
>
> We're thinking it might be a schema issue. Can you point us to the
> objectClass definition (should be a standard Internet2 edu object
> class) that LDAPPCNG2.x is working with? We'd like to check the
> schema implementation on our ED to see if it's compliant with LDAPPCNG2.x.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Lawrence Klug
>
> UCLA Middleware Services
>
> Office: 310 825-2061
>
> Cell: 818 667-2386
>
>
- [grouper-users] LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/08/2011
- [grouper-users] Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/08/2011
- [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/09/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Pål Axelsson, 11/09/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Ma, Ying, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/16/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Ma, Ying, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Pål Axelsson, 11/09/2011
- [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/09/2011
- [grouper-users] Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/08/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.