grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Klug, Lawrence" <>
- To: Tom Zeller <>
- Cc: Grouper Users Mailing List <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:48:20 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
I'm implementing the "uclaMember" objectClass. It's a bit confusing, so I
want to confirm with you.
In ldappc-resolver I made these changes:
Change this:
<resolver:DataConnector id="StaticDataConnector" xsi:type="dc:Static">
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass-eduMember">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>eduMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="stem-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>organizationalUnit</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="member-objectclass">
<dc:Value>eduMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
</resolver:DataConnector>
To This:
<resolver:DataConnector id="StaticDataConnector" xsi:type="dc:Static">
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="group-objectclass-uclaMember">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>${groupObjectClass}</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>uclaMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="stem-objectclass">
<dc:Value>top</dc:Value>
<dc:Value>organizationalUnit</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
<dc:Attribute id="member-objectclass">
<dc:Value>uclaMember</dc:Value>
</dc:Attribute>
</resolver:DataConnector>
Change this:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="group-objectclass-eduMember"
xsi:type="ad:Simple">
<resolver:Dependency ref="StaticDataConnector" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
To This:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="group-objectclass-uclaMember"
xsi:type="ad:Simple">
<resolver:Dependency ref="StaticDataConnector" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
Change this:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="hasMember" xsi:type="grouper:Member"
sourceAttributeID="members">
<resolver:Dependency ref="GroupDataConnector" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="ldap" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="g:gsa" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
To This:
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="uclaHasMember" xsi:type="grouper:Member"
sourceAttributeID="members">
<resolver:Dependency ref="GroupDataConnector" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="ldap" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" source="g:gsa" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
Question: Should this block be changed (isMemberOf => uclaIsMemberOf )?
<resolver:AttributeDefinition id="groupIsMemberOf" xsi:type="grouper:Group"
sourceAttributeID="groups">
<resolver:Dependency ref="GroupDataConnector" />
<grouper:Attribute id="name" />
</resolver:AttributeDefinition>
Thanks,
Lawrence
- [grouper-users] LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/08/2011
- [grouper-users] Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/08/2011
- [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/09/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Pål Axelsson, 11/09/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Ma, Ying, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/14/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/16/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/17/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/17/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/10/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Ma, Ying, 11/10/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Pål Axelsson, 11/09/2011
- [grouper-users] RE: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Klug, Lawrence, 11/09/2011
- [grouper-users] Re: LDAPCNG Issues - follow up question, Tom Zeller, 11/08/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.