grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Tom Zeller <>
- To: Lynn Garrison <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:11:07 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nRQToHDvwXdOIe2Z1ram93CkdVWcqJDo8Vn4scrz+h7UxqKwhejlN2p9bAgwrYD3zN 1AtbrFEE/67is2wSR/U5tG3IrGGjF+hxQChqZQsb1bmPx5y7SkLm9IEok6O5UJSCAq/i 0GCiJEfcDrIb0IMDwwOinbmefY8Xm9PndYI+Y=
Very vanilla.
Querying ldap, for subjects (in grouper) and for member identifiers
(in ldappcng), probably takes the most time.
I need to implement caching in ldappcng, probably by implementing the
TTL-based <ResultCache /> in the spml data connector similarly to the
ldap and rdbms data connectors.
However, ldap lookups are likely doubled if you are using the ldap or
jndi source adapters. So, a single caching ldap instance which is both
a source adapter and spml target would probably help the most.
I can attempt a single class which implements a grouper source adapter
and an ldappcng target.
Comments ?
[1] https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/SHIB2/ResolverLDAPDataConnector
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Lynn Garrison
<>
wrote:
> Tom,
> I have attached the two files. We switched to using the University
> of Washingtion ldap source adapter for the latest run. The times are about
> the same. The configuration have minor changes from the example file.
>
> The ldappc-resolver.xml has a members-psu-person defined. We are
> using the uid as the id for the source.
> The stem provision was deleted from the ldappcng.xml file.
>
> Lynn
>
>
> On Mar 16, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Tom Zeller wrote
>
>>>> Shall we pursue how to speed up your instance of ldappcng ?
>>
>>> Yes we would like to explore speeding up ldappcng. What information
>>> would you like me to provide?
>>
>> Let's start with ldappcng.xml and ldappc-resolver.xml. Could you reply
>> with sanitized versions, please ?
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
- [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/11/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Chris Hyzer, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Michael R. Gettes, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Michael R. Gettes, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, James Vuccolo, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Michael R. Gettes, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Tom Zeller, 03/14/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Tom Zeller, 03/16/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/17/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Tom Zeller, 03/23/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Tom Zeller, 03/24/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Tom Zeller, 03/24/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/17/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Tom Zeller, 03/16/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Michael R. Gettes, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/11/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Rob Hebron, 03/14/2011
- Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Lynn Garrison, 03/15/2011
- RE: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, Chris Hyzer, 03/11/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.