grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source

From: Tom Zeller <>
To: Lynn Garrison <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:38:38 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=E8NvEYRCJnKcOeX6B3fWCYRq16CYlbg8uJ+dZXxmk+9tvxejAp9LwIO6YiKH4nU/mO TV9/GKqsoRIfGFYrjQnOnHdCk4F4aBlBv+dyRLXSudy5cKeMS2oSRKRtGmBEYK779/WH SRqkMDG6ZZ0mGimeLg6E9R15BD8TbaVTbXJj0=

So, in my test environment (openldap configured in such a way as to
cache its DIT), provisioning a group with 10k members using ldappcng
1.6 took ~3 minutes. With unnecessary queries skipped, and caching, I
am now seeing something like 27 seconds. Of course, YMMV, but I will
continue profiling and hopefully will commit improvements soon.

TomZ

Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source, (continued)

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] ldap source vs jdbc source