Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] ldappc build question

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] ldappc build question

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Kathryn Huxtable <>
  • To: "Michael R. Gettes" <>
  • Cc: Grouper Users <>, Signet Users <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-users] ldappc build question
  • Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:17:05 -0500

Michael, I'm with you completely on this. It's easy to make it generate a jar, so I'll do that.

As a Maven2 user, I prefer separate jars for separate deployables.

As you know, we don't use Maven in the I2 projects and I'm not invested enough to take on that battle, but the principles still apply.


On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Michael R. Gettes wrote:
Kathryn, as you know, I have long been frustrated by the
"deployment design" of LDAPPC. ANYTHING you can do to simplify
it and have it actually make sense is a good thing! But, please,
don't redo the mistake in grouper 120 (i think that was the version)
where jars like subject-api got rolled into a larger jar file making
it impossible to try different versions (or test versions) of various
jar files as part of the development process for creating a service.
I guess a shorter way of saying this might - please also retain
the flexibility.

I hope this helps!


On Apr 2, 2008, at 14:09, Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
Is there any interest in having the build process for ldappc generate a jar, so that can easily be run from a simple directory with the grouper-api, signet-api, and other assorted jars?

Currently, it just generates a class directory.


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page