grouper-dev - [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation
Subject: Grouper Developers Forum
List archive
- From: caleb racey <>
- To: "'Jim Fox'" <>, "" <>
- Subject: [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:17:59 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB
- Acceptlanguage: en-GB
We at Newcastle would certainly be interested. We would be interested in the
code but even if the code is not suitable then just integration tips e.g.
"groups can be only z members large" or "the following characters are invalid
in group names".
Cal
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
>
> [
>]
> On Behalf Of Jim Fox
>Sent: 02 November 2010 19:41
>To:
>
>Subject: [grouper-dev] UW's group registry to google implementation
>
>
>One thing I need to make sure everyone knows is that our Grouper->Google
>(or whomever) is a *sample* implementation of *one* way to do this
>provisioning. It is certainly not something someone can build, install
>and run.
>
>If there is enough interest, we can reach some consensus on details of
>the
>process that are less UW-centric, we might be able to provide a more
>generic code base. No promises though.
>
>Jim
>
- [grouper-dev] UW's group registry to google implementation, Jim Fox, 11/02/2010
- [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation, caleb racey, 11/08/2010
- Re: [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation, Tom Zeller, 11/09/2010
- [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation, caleb racey, 11/08/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.