Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation

Subject: Grouper Developers Forum

List archive

Re: [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Zeller <>
  • To: Jim Fox <>
  • Cc: caleb racey <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] RE: UW's group registry to google implementation
  • Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:52:27 -0600
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=sHye8FC2Iad0XeOQjjd+rlBHAw3MfAUk0qQFZ6VpBOml1/UljozvIRKIxHTpt8Vup0 wK1wSCvtNC2lhryKMLkIlCI3hgB+PQ/vfX21jH1udMbl8YPDqJyo4pKuoPYyDh4ANlxL wcE0nX/cgX2KERHKrfL40x1NwMnARGbejgelc=
Of course, I'm interested too. I look forward to the sharing of wisdom.

TomZ

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:17 AM, caleb racey
<>
wrote:
> We at Newcastle would certainly be interested. We would be interested in
> the code but  even if the code is not suitable then just integration tips
> e.g.  "groups can be only z members large" or "the following characters are
> invalid in group names".
>
> Cal
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From:
>>
>> [
>>]
>> On Behalf Of Jim Fox
>>Sent: 02 November 2010 19:41
>>To:
>>
>>Subject: [grouper-dev] UW's group registry to google implementation
>>
>>
>>One thing I need to make sure everyone knows is that our Grouper->Google
>>(or whomever) is a *sample* implementation of *one* way to do this
>>provisioning.  It is certainly not something someone can build, install
>>and run.
>>
>>If there is enough interest, we can reach some consensus on details of
>>the
>>process that are less UW-centric, we might be able to provide a more
>>generic code base.  No promises though.
>>
>>Jim
>>
>
>

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page