grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] Grouper Hooks
Subject: Grouper Developers Forum
List archive
- From: "blair christensen." <>
- To: "Tom Barton" <>
- Cc: "Marcus Dübois" <>, "Grouper Dev" <>
- Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] Grouper Hooks
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:44:39 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ml+jI+GBp1e7FUgc5Dz5CtcyyAieDDPATGIcKo4xdrMmdgbG07U6CPOsWC/nn2rwO+ezlSI0yZit6wvX2/amOETeitbAwvtjtKYm8LtoQV+ID4Qv7CgxR1PKk4TWWANkPdxuHaDDD9hYxU+L5xEzzEt5XR4vemX2eXOC2oJPZtE=
On 8/9/07, Tom Barton
<>
wrote:
> I've attached the files to this page in the wiki:
> <https://wiki.internet2.edu/confluence/display/GrouperWG/Hooks>.
>
> An initial consideration by blair & Tom of which grouper API events to
> hook is found at
> <https://wiki.internet2.edu/confluence/display/GrouperWG/Candidate+Grouper+API+Hook+Points>.
>
> Let's proceed by first asking folks to take a look and reflect their
> opinions on this general approach back to the list. I'll also invite the
> UChicago Authority Manager developers to look at this from the
> perspective of implementing its external business rules, ie, evaluate
> the approach from the perspective of at least that one real application.
I think the approach mentioned by Tom combined with Marcus' proposal
to remove the logging code and replacing it with an aspect would make
for an excellent start.
- Grouper Hooks, Marcus Dübois, 08/09/2007
- Re: [grouper-dev] Grouper Hooks, Tom Barton, 08/09/2007
- Re: [grouper-dev] Grouper Hooks, blair christensen., 08/23/2007
- Re: [grouper-dev] Grouper Hooks, Tom Barton, 08/09/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.