comanage-dev - [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Marie Huynh <>
- To: Benn Oshrin <>
- Cc: comanage-dev <>
- Subject: [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:41:06 -0700
What browser did you take the screenshots with?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Marie Huynh
<>
wrote:
> Diffy goodness!
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Benn Oshrin
> <>
> wrote:
>> Yay!
>>
>>
>> On 8/23/12 7:42 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that's it. The sidebars and layout are another ticket.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Benn Oshrin
>>> <>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> OK, is there anything left on this one or is it done?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/12 1:57 AM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Done and uploaded to Coriander
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Benn Oshrin
>>>>> <>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just noticed that the CO Person tabs have table headers in each tab,
>>>>>> whereas the Org Identity tabs don't. This is presumably because the CO
>>>>>> Person view is also used with "compare", but it feels a bit
>>>>>> inconsistent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking we ditch them from CO Person, except when comparing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Benn-
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/22/12 8:54 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As per this morning's discussion, I've removed the add buttons from
>>>>>>> the view, changed the title of the tab, and swapped an nbsp for the
>>>>>>> space so it's wider.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Marie Huynh
>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I ran into some mysterious problems with Coriander earlier but it
>>>>>>>> mysteriously started working again. Can you take a look?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Benn Oshrin
>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let's discuss tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/12 8:56 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I worked on orgIDs first, and the idea of tabs came up while I was
>>>>>>>>>> working on copeople later. If converting to tabs, there would be
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> same number so not faster.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tabs for co people:
>>>>>>>>>> Name
>>>>>>>>>> Identifiers
>>>>>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>>>>>> Role Attributes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tabs for orgIDs:
>>>>>>>>>> Organizational Identity (Name/other stuff in form)
>>>>>>>>>> Identifiers
>>>>>>>>>> Phone
>>>>>>>>>> Address
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There isn't much data in each tab for the orgid view either, and I
>>>>>>>>>> thought it would be better to be able to see everything at a glance
>>>>>>>>>> rather than have to click for every bit of info. Or are we
>>>>>>>>>> expecting
>>>>>>>>>> people to have enough of any of them to require tabs?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Benn Oshrin
>>>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, didn't you tab co_people? In which case org_identities
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> easier because it's smaller...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/14/12 5:30 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We talked about having copeople tabbed but I didn't know you
>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>>>>>>>> that tabbed too. You didn't want a label for the first box.
>>>>>>>>>>>> What
>>>>>>>>>>>> tabs should there be? I'm concerned that there will be too many
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> fit with a sidebar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Benn Oshrin
>>>>>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I like where this is going. Perhaps we should do a call tomorrow
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nitpick
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some stuff?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought org_identities was going to be tabbed as well?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/10/12 9:18 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://coriander.phys.uwm.edu/gears/co_people/compare/1/co:1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://coriander.phys.uwm.edu/gears/org_identities/edit/1/co:1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Coriander still has a few issues but AFAIK they shouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demo. There are still some layout bugs that only show up in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Firefox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I kept the layout of role attributes, though the action buttons
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still on the right for that while they're on the left for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The changes to add a sidebar in are out of the scope of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket; I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only uploaded what is in the latest diff and would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Marie Huynh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's a diff. I'll send a link to a demo later today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Benn Oshrin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Getting there... let's take a few minutes on today's call to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nitpick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/1/12 7:47 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the latest version:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ek8gj/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's more obvious now that the save and cancel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buttons
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with the form and not the other elements in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> box
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right side. I removed the zebra pattern and rearranged the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the right to have headers(in default ui style) to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emphasize
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are their own type of information. Let me know what you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Marie Huynh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It looks a little weird as is...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> boxes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be forced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be the same height?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They will be closer in height after I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes, but the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right needs to be allowed to grow with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> items.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How weird will it look if the left and right
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> grow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pace? ie: Left gets blank padded at the bottom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> height when right is taller.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We were just trying to visually separate the two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fields/buttons. I don't think it makes sense to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> force
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with extra space. It's also ugly to do with CSS,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meaning it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires javascript or other hacks, or going back
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tables.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And maybe the border should become a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> black
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thicker (line2 color)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clarify?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at the latest version, it appears
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gray
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> colors: line1, line2, and the border. I guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps the contrast could be improved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ej93g/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ej92d/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should start cc'ing Heather :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Benn-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, (continued)
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/10/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/13/2012
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/14/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/14/2012
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/22/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/22/2012
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/27/2012
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/13/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/10/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.