COmanage Developers List

[Marie Huynh <>]

I worked on orgIDs first, and the idea of tabs came up while I was
working on copeople later.  If converting to tabs, there would be the
same number so not faster.

Tabs for co people:
    Name
    Identifiers
    Email
    Groups
    Role Attributes

Tabs for orgIDs:
    Organizational Identity (Name/other stuff in form)
    Identifiers
    Email
    Phone
    Address

There isn't much data in each tab for the orgid view either, and I
thought it would be better to be able to see everything at a glance
rather than have to click for every bit of info.  Or are we expecting
people to have enough of any of them to require tabs?


On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Benn Oshrin 
<>
 wrote:
> Wait, didn't you tab co_people? In which case org_identities should be
> easier because it's smaller...
>
>
> On 8/14/12 5:30 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>
>> We talked about having copeople tabbed but I didn't know you wanted
>> that tabbed too.  You didn't want a label for the first box.  What
>> tabs should there be?  I'm concerned that there will be too many to
>> fit with a sidebar.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Benn Oshrin 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I like where this is going. Perhaps we should do a call tomorrow to
>>> nitpick
>>> some stuff?
>>>
>>> I thought org_identities was going to be tabbed as well?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/10/12 9:18 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://coriander.phys.uwm.edu/gears/co_people/compare/1/co:1
>>>> https://coriander.phys.uwm.edu/gears/org_identities/edit/1/co:1
>>>>
>>>> Coriander still has a few issues but AFAIK they shouldn't affect this
>>>> demo.  There are still some layout bugs that only show up in Firefox.
>>>> I kept the layout of role attributes, though the action buttons are
>>>> still on the right for that while they're on the left for the others.
>>>> The changes to add a sidebar in are out of the scope of this ticket; I
>>>> only uploaded what is in the latest diff and would be committed.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Marie Huynh 
>>>> <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a diff.  I'll send a link to a demo later today.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Benn Oshrin 
>>>>> <>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Getting there... let's take a few minutes on today's call to nitpick
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/1/12 7:47 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the latest version:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ek8gj/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it's more obvious now that the save and cancel buttons are
>>>>>>> associated with the form and not the other elements in the box on the
>>>>>>> right side.  I removed the zebra pattern and rearranged the elements
>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>> on the right to have headers(in default ui style) to emphasize that
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> are their own type of information.  Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Marie Huynh 
>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>> <mailto:>>
>>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                    It looks a little weird as is... perhaps the two
>>>>>>> boxes
>>>>>>>               can be forced
>>>>>>>                    to be the same height?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               They will be closer in height after I'm done with the
>>>>>>>               changes, but the
>>>>>>>               right needs to be allowed to grow with the addition of
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>               items.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           How weird will it look if the left and right grow at the
>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>           pace? ie: Left gets blank padded at the bottom to match
>>>>>>> right's
>>>>>>>           height when right is taller.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       We were just trying to visually separate the two sets of
>>>>>>>       fields/buttons.  I don't think it makes sense to force them to
>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>       with extra space.  It's also ugly to do with CSS, meaning it
>>>>>>>       requires javascript or other hacks, or going back to tables.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                    And maybe the border should become a thin black
>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>               instead of
>>>>>>>                    thicker (line2 color)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>            >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               Clarify?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           Looking at the latest version, it appears we're using three
>>>>>>> gray
>>>>>>>           colors: line1, line2, and the border. I guess this is OK,
>>>>>>> though
>>>>>>>           perhaps the contrast could be improved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ej93g/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ej92d/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           We should start cc'ing Heather :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>           -Benn-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>