comanage-dev - [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Benn Oshrin <>
- To: Marie Huynh <>
- Cc: comanage-dev <>
- Subject: [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:51:00 -0400
Let's discuss tomorrow.
On 8/14/12 8:56 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
I worked on orgIDs first, and the idea of tabs came up while I was
working on copeople later. If converting to tabs, there would be the
same number so not faster.
Tabs for co people:
Name
Identifiers
Groups
Role Attributes
Tabs for orgIDs:
Organizational Identity (Name/other stuff in form)
Identifiers
Phone
Address
There isn't much data in each tab for the orgid view either, and I
thought it would be better to be able to see everything at a glance
rather than have to click for every bit of info. Or are we expecting
people to have enough of any of them to require tabs?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Benn Oshrin
<>
wrote:
Wait, didn't you tab co_people? In which case org_identities should be
easier because it's smaller...
On 8/14/12 5:30 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
We talked about having copeople tabbed but I didn't know you wanted
that tabbed too. You didn't want a label for the first box. What
tabs should there be? I'm concerned that there will be too many to
fit with a sidebar.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Benn Oshrin
<>
wrote:
I like where this is going. Perhaps we should do a call tomorrow to
nitpick
some stuff?
I thought org_identities was going to be tabbed as well?
On 8/10/12 9:18 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
https://coriander.phys.uwm.edu/gears/co_people/compare/1/co:1
https://coriander.phys.uwm.edu/gears/org_identities/edit/1/co:1
Coriander still has a few issues but AFAIK they shouldn't affect this
demo. There are still some layout bugs that only show up in Firefox.
I kept the layout of role attributes, though the action buttons are
still on the right for that while they're on the left for the others.
The changes to add a sidebar in are out of the scope of this ticket; I
only uploaded what is in the latest diff and would be committed.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Marie Huynh
<>
wrote:
Here's a diff. I'll send a link to a demo later today.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Benn Oshrin
<>
wrote:
Getting there... let's take a few minutes on today's call to nitpick
some
more.
On 8/1/12 7:47 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
This is the latest version:
https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ek8gj/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
I think it's more obvious now that the save and cancel buttons are
associated with the form and not the other elements in the box on the
right side. I removed the zebra pattern and rearranged the elements
now
on the right to have headers(in default ui style) to emphasize that
they
are their own type of information. Let me know what you think.
Marie
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Marie Huynh
<
<mailto:>>
wrote:
It looks a little weird as is... perhaps the two
boxes
can be forced
to be the same height?
They will be closer in height after I'm done with the
changes, but the
right needs to be allowed to grow with the addition of
more
items.
How weird will it look if the left and right grow at the
same
pace? ie: Left gets blank padded at the bottom to match
right's
height when right is taller.
We were just trying to visually separate the two sets of
fields/buttons. I don't think it makes sense to force them to
match
with extra space. It's also ugly to do with CSS, meaning it
requires javascript or other hacks, or going back to tables.
And maybe the border should become a thin black
line
instead of
thicker (line2 color)?
>
Clarify?
Looking at the latest version, it appears we're using three
gray
colors: line1, line2, and the border. I guess this is OK,
though
perhaps the contrast could be improved.
https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ej93g/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/ej92d/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
We should start cc'ing Heather :)
-Benn-
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/01/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/03/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/10/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/10/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/13/2012
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/14/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/14/2012
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/22/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/22/2012
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/23/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/27/2012
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/13/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/10/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Marie Huynh, 08/10/2012
- [comanage-dev] Re: CO-360, CO-361, Benn Oshrin, 08/03/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.