COmanage Developers List

[Heather Flanagan <>]

I've renamed it:

https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/LIGO+CO%2C+COU%2C+and+Group+Perspective

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Koranda" 
<>
To: "Heather Flanagan" 
<>
Cc: "comanage-dev" 
<>
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 11:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] updated CO vs COU doc

Hi,

> Thanks for the feedback, Scott.  It has been incorporated.
> 
> You wrote a CO vs. COU vs. Group doc a while back.  

I did? Sorry, it's hard to keep track of these things.

Is it in the wiki?

> Should that be kept in the child pages?  
> If so, either that doc or my doc needs to change its name.

I think you should do whatever you need to do...

Cheers,

Scott

> 
> -Heather 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Koranda" 
> <>
> To: "Heather Flanagan" 
> <>
> Cc: "comanage-dev" 
> <>
> Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:36:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] updated CO vs COU doc
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > Hi all -
> > 
> > As mentioned on the dev call today, here's the latest CO versus COU 
> > draft, incorporating feedback from Ann and Tom B.
> > 
> > https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/CO+vs.+COU
> > 
> 
> My apology for taking so long to get back to you.
> 
> I think this looks good. In particular I like this:
> 
> If you have an organization with common goals and common
> policies, and yet within that understanding you have unique
> requirements that the different groups will have different
> paths to joining and participating in those groups, you have a
> CO that contains COUs.  If you have one, common set of
> policies that define how individuals are added or removed from
> the CO, then you do not have COU even though you may have
> groups for simple access control.
> 
> I have only minor comments:
> 
> - I would remove the opening phrase "Within the COmanage
>   terminology..." and just start with "This document clarifies
>   the difference between a CO and a COU and why a COU is..."
> 
> - I would change "combined with workflows" to be more
>   specific by saying "combined with enrollment and
>   de-enrollment workflow" or "combined with onboarding and
>   offboarding workflows"
> 
> I made one edit myself, changing "gravitation waves" to
> "gravitational waves"--this is an important difference to
> anyone in our field. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott