Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] updated CO vs COU doc

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

Re: [comanage-dev] updated CO vs COU doc


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Scott Koranda <>
  • To: Heather Flanagan <>
  • Cc: comanage-dev <>
  • Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] updated CO vs COU doc
  • Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:36:22 -0500

Hi,

> Hi all -
>
> As mentioned on the dev call today, here's the latest CO versus COU draft,
> incorporating feedback from Ann and Tom B.
>
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/COmanage/CO+vs.+COU
>

My apology for taking so long to get back to you.

I think this looks good. In particular I like this:

If you have an organization with common goals and common
policies, and yet within that understanding you have unique
requirements that the different groups will have different
paths to joining and participating in those groups, you have a
CO that contains COUs. If you have one, common set of
policies that define how individuals are added or removed from
the CO, then you do not have COU even though you may have
groups for simple access control.

I have only minor comments:

- I would remove the opening phrase "Within the COmanage
terminology..." and just start with "This document clarifies
the difference between a CO and a COU and why a COU is..."

- I would change "combined with workflows" to be more
specific by saying "combined with enrollment and
de-enrollment workflow" or "combined with onboarding and
offboarding workflows"

I made one edit myself, changing "gravitation waves" to
"gravitational waves"--this is an important difference to
anyone in our field.

Thanks,

Scott



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page