wg-pic - Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Candace Holman <>
- To: Michael Van Norman <>
- Cc: ,
- Subject: Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:39:38 -0400
Well, they do not have the same Contact header (the ip address will be different), so the subscriber will get updates from both the Contacts. These updates will be performed on a single URI in the subscriber's contact list, so the client is acting as the merging process for the updates. The server doesn't know whether you are actually switching from away to available between the two machines, or whether you are logged in twice.
The client doesn't know that you have a split presence-personality unless you register with a different URI at different devices. Do you consider this is a bug or a feature? If we could put in a feature request to allow multiple device logins, would you like it to be something that we could configure on the server? Or on the client?
Candace
Michael Van Norman wrote:
I was not seeing the 481s. I am running with the default 3600 second interval (I am going to watch it for a while and see what happens).
I have however noticed something else: what should happen when you have multiple clients using the same URI? Right now, the presence "flops" between them. If I am away at my desk, but available on my laptop, a subscriber seems to get the two states alternating.
/Mike
Candace Holman wrote:
Hi all,
In testing with David from UPenn, we discovered a problem on the client that will have a BIG impact on your testing. Do not set the EyeBeam Presence Agent Refresh Interval to 10 seconds, set it to something much larger like 86400 seconds. My apologies. I will update the web site. If you were having problems with presence only working for a little while (10 seconds?), try this change and you should see continuous presence updates every 30 seconds or so!
I wrote that you should set the Presence Agent Refresh Interval to 10 seconds. I assumed that this was the same as the refresh rate for presence updates, but it is not. This is actually the maximum time that you will remain subscribed to do presence updates with your server. If you try to send presence updates after the refresh interval terminates, in the Diagnostic Log you will see a header like: *Subscription-State: terminated;reason=timeout* and then the reply from the server will say: *SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist* The only thing that will cause your client to SUBSCRIBE again is to disable and re-enable the account registration. But setting the refresh interval to 86400 will make the subscription last for 24 hours.
Candace
- Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/19/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Michael Van Norman, 08/19/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/19/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Michael Van Norman, 08/19/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Steve Blair, 08/19/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Michael Van Norman, 08/19/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Michael Van Norman, 08/19/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/20/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Dennis Baron, 08/22/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/22/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Michael Van Norman, 08/22/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Dennis Baron, 08/25/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/22/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Michael Van Norman, 08/22/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/22/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Dennis Baron, 08/22/2005
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/20/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Candace Holman, 08/19/2005
- Re: [pic-ser] Important update to pic-ser documentation, Michael Van Norman, 08/19/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.