Presence and IntComm WG

[Xiaotao Wu <>]

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Rork, Joseph (J.P.) wrote:

> One topic that we didn't get a chance to talk about on yesterday's call
> was the additional items that need to be appended to the  current client
> requirements documents.  (push-to-talk, iLBC, etc)  I'm looking for

For iLBC requirement, I think it will be just one line to mention the
clients SHOULD support iLBC codec. Should we by default use iLBC?

For push-to-talk, is that for conference? It should be part of the
conference floor control, but I don't think the IETF floor control draft
has been settled. Should we wait?
For SIP based conference floor control, see the message posted by Jonathan
Rosenberg
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg06630.html
it's not yet defined in sipping conferencing framework.
There is a binary floor control by Gonzalo
http://standards.ericsson.net/gonzalo/papers/draft-camarillo-xcon-bfcp-00.txt
Still in -00 draft stage, we'd better wait till it's more stable.

-Xiaotao

> someone that is interested in being the shepard of that document.  The
> obvious people that could be owners would be Xiaotao and/or Jamey, but
> it may offer the opportunity to someone else in the group to become
> intimately involved with the technology.  Any takers?
>
> Begging the question, what is the group's feeling about the likelihood
> that we recruit more clients to play with this group?  Rumors from last
> meeting was that Session would be adding some of this added
> functionality, and of course we have sipc, but are there any more?  Is
> the work product being created here with the client requirement
> documentation useful?
>
> Regards,
> Joseph Rork
> Associate Architect
> Next Generation Collaborative Computing, SIE
> Ford Motor Company
> Phone: 313-594-6672
> Email: 
> 
> "There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary,
> and those who don't."
>
>
>