wg-multicast - RE: AMT questions
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: "Zenon Mousmoulas" <>
- To: "Curtis, Bruce" <>, "wg-multicast" <>
- Subject: RE: AMT questions
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:02:48 +0200
Actually, if you look at the diagram, the caption above the little box in
"LAST MILE #1" reads "AMT ENABLED ROUTER" and its' uplink is also marked with
"AMT TUNNEL". This is how I reached the conclusion that the CPE (rather than
the "customer computer") runs the AMT gateway in the depicted topology, and
also why I reused the specific wording in that diagram. Other than that, I
think the difference between the AMT gateway and relay is clear.
Apologies for any confusion this may have caused.
-----Αρχικό μήνυμα-----
Από: Curtis, Bruce
[mailto:]
Αποστολή: Πεμ 10/3/2011 8:43 μμ
Προς: wg-multicast
Κοιν.: Zenon Mousmoulas
Θέμα: Re: AMT questions
On Mar 9, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> thanks for relaying this information. In the tech note mentioned below, the
> last figure shows that Octoshape relies on AMT-enabled routers, while the
> following text implies that Octoshape client itself performs the AMT
> gateway function:
The AMT-enabled router in the diagram is on the network that doesn't have
multicast enabled on the last mile (to the customer computer). So AMT on the
customer computer talks to an AMT relay (which in the diagram is the router
providing the AMT relay function) and the router talks native multicast to
the world.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.3/topics/concept/amt-operation.html
- RE: AMT questions, Richard Machida, 03/07/2011
- RE: AMT questions, Zenon Mousmoulas, 03/09/2011
- Re: AMT questions, Curtis, Bruce, 03/10/2011
- RE: AMT questions, Zenon Mousmoulas, 03/10/2011
- Re: AMT questions, Curtis, Bruce, 03/10/2011
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- FW: AMT questions, Scott Brown, 03/10/2011
- RE: AMT questions, Zenon Mousmoulas, 03/09/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.