Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: Legality of using VLC

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: Legality of using VLC


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Frank Fulchiero <>
  • To: Michael Wellings <>
  • Cc: Richard Mavrogeanes <>, ,
  • Subject: Re: Legality of using VLC
  • Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:09:16 -0400

Hi,

Sorry, I guess I did not explain myself very well. My intent was to determine whether if you (or the computer manufacturer, or software maker) pays for the MPEG2 decoder once, if the license has to be paid a second time on the same computer.

I realize that WMP does not include an MPEG2 decoder, however, it can use one that has already been installed on a stock machine. We have hundreds of stock Dells, with DVD hardware players, and Cyberlink PowerDVD included.

No-one installed third-party decoders, but one is probably included with PowerDVD.

So, when you click on a DVD, Windows gives you a choice of opening it with PowerDVD, Windows Media Player, or Real Player. All three work fine.

If the license is per player, then someone would have to purchase three licenses to be legally use each player, right?

So, the question is, how does Windows Media Player get away with playing DVDs when it has not licensed the MPEG2 codec, if the license is per player?

And if they can play MPEG2 encoded video without a license, why can't VLC also play MPEG2 legally on a computer that had a DVD mechanism with an included player?

Frank Fulchiero
Digital Media Specialist
Connecticut College


On Apr 4, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Michael Wellings wrote:



hi frank

the fact that you were able to play the DVD proves the presence of an MPEG-2 codec on your machine. my guess is that Windows media is using one of these

Windows Media Player definitely doesn't ship with MPEG-2 capability

mike wellings
director, engineering
UW/Researchchannel


On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Frank Fulchiero wrote:

Hi Richard, thanks for looking into this.

The next step would be to figure out which video codecs need to be licensed.
For example, if a codec is not used, it could be removed, and then there should not be a licensing issue.

And whether licenses have to be paid twice.
Yesterday I played a DVD in a PC using Windows Media Player.
You mentioned that Microsoft does not include an MPEG2 decoder, yet I was able to do that.
There were no third party codecs installed.
How does that work from a licensing standpoint?

Thanks for your work on this, I hope you can help us figure out a better system than what we have now. It's really needed.

Frank Fulchiero
Digital Media Specialist
Connecticut College

(sorry, my email is flaky today, might have hit the send button twice)


On Apr 4, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Richard Mavrogeanes wrote:

From the MPEGLA:
Hi, Rich.
Good to hear from you as always.
VLC player is treated the same as any other product: it needs to be
licensed under essential patents for each video codec as well as any
other technologies it contains. To the extent it is not so licensed,
the product's provider along with anyone in the product chain is left
with patent infringement liability.
Best regards,
Dean
Dean Skandalis
Vice President, Licensing
MPEG LA
4601 Willard Avenue
Suite 200
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815
U.S.A.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page