wg-multicast - RE: Legality of using VLC
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: "Fulchiero, Frank (Information Services)" <>
- To: "Michael Wellings" <>
- Cc: "Richard Mavrogeanes" <>, <>, <>
- Subject: RE: Legality of using VLC
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:55:06 -0400
Thanks, I will try some other computers, see who snuck one in.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wellings
[mailto:]
Sent: Wed 4/4/2007 2:34 PM
To: Fulchiero, Frank (Information Services)
Cc: Richard Mavrogeanes;
;
Subject: Re: Legality of using VLC
hi frank
the fact that you were able to play the DVD proves the presence of an
MPEG-2 codec on your machine. my guess is that Windows media is using one
of these
Windows Media Player definitely doesn't ship with MPEG-2 capability
mike wellings
director, engineering
UW/Researchchannel
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Frank Fulchiero wrote:
> Hi Richard, thanks for looking into this.
>
> The next step would be to figure out which video codecs need to be licensed.
> For example, if a codec is not used, it could be removed, and then there
> should not be a licensing issue.
>
> And whether licenses have to be paid twice.
> Yesterday I played a DVD in a PC using Windows Media Player.
> You mentioned that Microsoft does not include an MPEG2 decoder, yet I was
> able to do that.
> There were no third party codecs installed.
> How does that work from a licensing standpoint?
>
> Thanks for your work on this, I hope you can help us figure out a better
> system than what we have now. It's really needed.
>
> Frank Fulchiero
> Digital Media Specialist
> Connecticut College
>
> (sorry, my email is flaky today, might have hit the send button twice)
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Richard Mavrogeanes wrote:
>
>> From the MPEGLA:
>>
>> Hi, Rich.
>>
>> Good to hear from you as always.
>>
>> VLC player is treated the same as any other product: it needs to be
>> licensed under essential patents for each video codec as well as any
>> other technologies it contains. To the extent it is not so licensed,
>> the product's provider along with anyone in the product chain is left
>> with patent infringement liability.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Dean
>>
>> Dean Skandalis
>> Vice President, Licensing
>> MPEG LA
>> 4601 Willard Avenue
>> Suite 200
>> Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815
>> U.S.A.
>
- RE: Legality of using VLC, (continued)
- RE: Legality of using VLC, Richard Mavrogeanes, 04/03/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Marshall Eubanks, 04/03/2007
- RE: Legality of using VLC, Richard Mavrogeanes, 04/03/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Marshall Eubanks, 04/03/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Dan Oachs, 04/03/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Frank Fulchiero, 04/03/2007
- RE: Legality of using VLC, Richard Mavrogeanes, 04/04/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Bill Owens, 04/04/2007
- RE: Legality of using VLC, Richard Mavrogeanes, 04/04/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Frank Fulchiero, 04/04/2007
- RE: Legality of using VLC, Richard Mavrogeanes, 04/04/2007
- Message not available
- RE: Legality of using VLC, Fulchiero, Frank (Information Services), 04/04/2007
- Message not available
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Frank Fulchiero, 04/06/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Frank Fulchiero, 04/08/2007
- Re: Legality of using VLC, Bill Owens, 04/04/2007
- RE: Legality of using VLC, Richard Mavrogeanes, 04/03/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.