wg-multicast - Re: question about PIM Null-Registers

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: question about PIM Null-Registers

From: Dino Farinacci <>
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: question about PIM Null-Registers
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:30:14 -0700

>> The checksum field must also be correct, as I recently discovered.
>> Juniper will drop Null-Registers with a bad encapsulated IP checksum.

And this is good news.

Dino

question about PIM Null-Registers, Charles R. Anderson, 05/15/2003
- Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Tom Pusateri, 05/15/2003
  - Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Charles R. Anderson, 05/19/2003
    - Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, John Zwiebel, 05/19/2003
    - Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Tom Pusateri, 05/19/2003
      - Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Charles R. Anderson, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Tom Pusateri, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Charles R. Anderson, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Tom Pusateri, 05/19/2003
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Charles R. Anderson, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Dino Farinacci, 05/19/2003
      - Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Dino Farinacci, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Tom Pusateri, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Dino Farinacci, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Tom Pusateri, 05/19/2003
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Charles R. Anderson, 05/19/2003
        
        Re: question about PIM Null-Registers, Dino Farinacci, 05/19/2003

List archive

Re: question about PIM Null-Registers