wg-multicast - Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Mark Fullmer <>
- To: Hugh LaMaster <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 1999 10:07:19 -0400
> > 224.0.1.22 991 SVRLOC.MCAST.NET
> > 224.0.1.35 917 SVRLOC-DA.MCAST.NET
>
> I'm not familiar with the above two. What are they about?
It's a service location protocol. It appears to be
Novell clients and servers using it. see www.srvloc.org
> This one is very nasty, not because of "Dogfight", but,
> because SGI "objectserver" also uses it. (Yes, I have
> seen users accidentally sharing peoplepages phonebook entries
> with people halfway across the world. People they never
> even heard of. Very amusing. In one case, I recall
> hearing a user saying, "Whoever the
> !@#$%^&*
> is this
> guy, and what is he doing on my system!?")
Same with the svrloc. We had people complaining about filesystems
showing up from other countries in their service list.
> > 224.0.1.60 142 HP-DEVICE-DISC.MCAST.NET
>
> What is this one? I have not heard of it.
I think it's HP hubs.
> While you are on the subject, you should also add "rwhod" in
> its several variants. Sometimes rwhod is configured with TTL=16
> or higher, and you end up with a worldwide broadcast domain
> sharing rwhod information. Ugly.
>
> I believe I have seen traffic on both 224.0.1.3 and 224.0.2.1.
> You can also filter the port (udp 513 IIRC).
>
> Another potentially ugly one which is sometimes configured,
> for reasons I don't understand, with a high TTL, is sunrpc.
> Again, you have a choice of filtering the address, IIRC,
> 224.0.2.2, or the port, 111.
I wish there was a better way to know about these groups ahead
of time.
--
mark
- RE: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Wallace, Steven S, 07/01/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, David Meyer, 07/01/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Gordon Rogier, 07/01/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Mark Fullmer, 07/01/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, David Meyer, 07/02/1999
- Message not available
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Mark Fullmer, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Bill Fenner, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Havard . Eidnes, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Bill Fenner, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Hugh LaMaster, 07/09/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Hugh LaMaster, 07/09/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Gordon Rogier, 07/10/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Bill Fenner, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Havard . Eidnes, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, John Meylor, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Mark Fullmer, 07/13/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Bill Fenner, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Mark Fullmer, 07/07/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, David Meyer, 07/01/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Guy T Almes, 07/11/1999
- Re: So we need some scoping for non-global I2 multicast groups, Guy T Almes, 07/11/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.