Registry Working Group

[Michael H Lambert <>]

Forwarding my own email back to the list...

Should I take silence to mean that, upon further reflection, there is no real 
interest in having a working group on IRR?  If we're going to accomplish 
anything, it can't just be on calls.

Michael

> On 14 Dec 2018, at 15:34, Michael H Lambert 
> <>
>  wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> In a fit of non-lucidity I told Dale I would be willing to chair the IRR 
> working group.  I've been remiss in sending out an initial message, but 
> here goes.
> 
> I'll throw out some discussion points for possible directions for the 
> group.  I figure we can schedule a call for sometime in early January to 
> provide some focus to what I'm sure will show up on this list.  I expect a 
> lot of this to mesh nicely with points on Grover's agenda for the Global 
> Summit MANRS workshop. 
> 
> o Motivation for using IRR.  Potential loss of peering with Google and 
> Cloudflare is significant, but that isn't the only reason.
> 
> o How-Tos for various aspects of IRR.  Working with registries, tools, etc.
> 
> o Perhaps this would culminate with a white paper on best practices.
> 
> Is concluding the group by the end of June realistic?  It's not supposed to 
> be long-lived.
> 
> I'm looking forward to responses and discussion.
> 
> Michael
> 
>