shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott E." <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:14:08 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
>That's true, since the extensions have to have config added and there's
>the possibility of error - unlike with say the standard SAML stuff which
>will be there as long as OpenSAML itself is. It would be easy enough to
>wrap calls in the extension in a helper, with null checks and explicit
>logging. Just a bit of busy work. I can do, it's really just a
>question of where it falls in the priority list.
It was more of a suggestion for ongoing use of extensions in any future
work.
-- Scott
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Halm Reusser, 01/05/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Halm Reusser, 01/07/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.